Doug Peters / EMPICS Entertainment Doug Peters / EMPICS Entertainment / EMPICS Entertainment

THE FIFTY SHADES of Grey books might be heavy on lads and lady gardens, lámh dropping and beast-with-two-backs making, but the first movie in the franchise was accused of being fairly light on smut.

That’s why news that the film’s star Jamie Dornan has been offered a big (snigger) bonus to go full frontal in the second film Fifty Shades Darker.

Neither Dornan nor his co-star Dakota Johnson showed everything down below in the movie, (although they weren’t far off).

Now an ‘insider’ has revealed that he’s been offered around $1.5million extra on top of his paycheck to get his lad out, with Heatworld reporting:

They have assured Jamie that it won’t be overt, but more of a brief tease- and he’ll have some creative control over how it’s handled.

Some things to consider:

Jamie Dornan’s penisis already readily available online

The actor, who’s also a model, stripped off for this photoshoot in 2007. We have pixelated it to preserve your modesty, you filthy articles.

Interview Magazine 2007 Interview Magazine 2007

What about the penis bag?

Dornan told GQ:

Your dignity is intact as much as it’s all tucked away in a little flesh-coloured bag… As a guy you put all your essentials in a little bag and you tie it up like a little bag of grapes and it’s tucked away. It’s quite a peculiar thing to do every day.

Does this mean less arse time?

Fifty Shades director Sam Taylor Johnson told The Evening Standard that the reason there are so many shots of Dornan’s bum in the first film is because she wanted “a balance of nudity”, given that Dakota Johnson appeared topless in many scenes.

We couldn’t ever show Jamie full frontal so you’ve only got his bum left. Chest isn’t as much a statement as a naked woman’s chest so unfortunately for Jamie it was his butt that got the most exposure.

Speaking of Dakota Johnson, is she being offered the same cash incentive? 

It may look like Johnson shows everything off in Fifty Shades of Grey, but in fact her pubic hair was a special effect.

Cinematographer Seamus McGarvey revealed

Dakota had kind of a patch that went over her pubic area, and right round her whole body. We were in the curious situation, in post-production, of adding [pubic hair]. I wouldn’t say it was one of the highlights of my career, but it certainly was one of the most surreal scenarios.

It’s unclear if she’s being offered the extra millions to ‘do a Dornan’ on it.

Dakota Johnson’s had a row with her mam on the red carpet

21 honest thoughts I had while watching 50 Shades of Grey