This site uses cookies to improve your experience and to provide services and advertising. By continuing to browse, you agree to the use of cookies described in our Cookies Policy. You may change your settings at any time but this may impact on the functionality of the site. To learn more see our Cookies Policy.
OK
Dublin: 7 °C Wednesday 16 April, 2025
Advertisement

Everyone is ripping the piss out of this comically unflattering (and expensive) dress

Who is this for?

DO YOU EVER see a garment so obviously unflattering that you wonder who on Earth would purchase it or how a shop could have the temerity to try flog it in the first place?

Last week, writer Doree Shafrir stumbled upon this dress (read: sack) from the brand Creatures of Comfort.

“bless everyone who is pretty enough, skinny enough, and rich enough to wear this dress,” she wrote.

In fairness, this dress would suit approximately 1% of women, right?

The dress retails for $450 and is described on the website as:

The Creatures of Comfort Sequoia Dress is a partial button up dress with a drop shoulder and gathered sleeve. Cut from midweight, Japanese weathercloth with a crisp, cool hand in army green.

$450 for a dress that the woman in American Gothic would think is dowdy.

COFC_FW17_SEQUOIA_DRESS_WEATHERCLOTH_ARMY-3_1024x1024 Source: Creatures of Comfort

cr It's not great, hun. Source: Wikipedia

Following Shafrir’s tweet, the internet pounced on the dress.

And, oh, was it enjoyable.

good Source: spencer claus/Twitter

sabr Source: YouTube

It’s called tuberculosis chic, okay?

died Source: Ellen Tannam/Twitter

Anyone getting Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt vibes?

resh Source: resha/Twitter

Unbreakable-Kimmy-Schmidt-Season-1-Episode-5-24-d84e Source: Netflix

$450 to look like you’re living in a dystopian nightmare.

Er, we’ll pass.

dsu Source: Jamie Frevele/Twitter

At least it inspired some excellent puns, eh?

Not a total dead loss.

ams Source: Toby Herman

DailyEdge is on Snapchat! Tap the button below to add!

About the author:

Amy O'Connor

Read next:

COMMENTS (5)