This site uses cookies to improve your experience and to provide services and advertising.
By continuing to browse, you agree to the use of cookies described in our Cookies Policy.
You may change your settings at any time but this may impact on the functionality of the site.
To learn more see our Cookies Policy.
Some people believe in waiting until every morsel is eaten before going for the second layer. Others insist it’s OK to dip underneath for your favourites, even when there are chocolates left above. Which side are you on?
Is it ever OK to go for the second layer of chocolates without finishing the first?
Poll Results:
Maybe. But ONLY when the really gammy ones are left on top, and realistically nobody's going to eat them. (786)
Yes! Chocolate has no rules. (444)
No, never. You always have to finish the top layer, otherwise it's anarchy. (264)
Monday 25 November, 2024
Monday 25 November, 2024
Download our app
Is it OK to start the second layer of chocolates before finishing the first?
ON THE ONE hand, a box of chocolates is a wonderful cornucopia of delights for all the family.
On the other, it’s a dog-eat-dog battle where the weakest and slowest are left with the manky strawberry cremes.
So here’s the question: if you’re left with the dregs, is it OK to go for the second layer?
Some people believe in waiting until every morsel is eaten before going for the second layer. Others insist it’s OK to dip underneath for your favourites, even when there are chocolates left above. Which side are you on?
Is it ever OK to go for the second layer of chocolates without finishing the first?
Poll Results:
Let the debate begin in the comments…
More: A Definitive Ranking of Irish Christmas Chocolates, From Worst To Best>
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
arguments Chocolate chocolates christmas chocolates second layer under the cardboard yule2014