This site uses cookies to improve your experience and to provide services and advertising.
By continuing to browse, you agree to the use of cookies described in our Cookies Policy.
You may change your settings at any time but this may impact on the functionality of the site.
To learn more see our Cookies Policy.
IF YOU’VE BEEN following along with The Apprentice for the whole series, you’ll be aware that 2017′s selection of candidates hasn’t exactly been the strongest in the show’s history.
James and Sarah were the last two standing going into last night’s final – and if you didn’t watch it and care about who won, now’s the time to look away:
Instead of a tense, climactic moment where Sugar picked a winner in the boardroom… he hired both candidates
You can’t have TWO winners. That’s not the point?! Honestly, what has this years #TheApprentice been.. the worst finalists he’s ever had and let’s them both win. Utter bollocks.
Never before in the history of the show has a double hiring took place – with Sugar making investments in James’s recruitment business and Sarah’s sweet company.
People were quick to point out that Michaela had been fired for not focussing her efforts on one business
Some irony in Lord Sugar not putting Michaela into final because she couldn’t focus on just one business, then doing that #TheApprentice
With people commenting throughout the season that it wasn’t exactly a stellar lineup, you had to feel for the people who came second in other years
Sugar’s just, like, so quirky
Whoops!
We couldn't find this Tweet
Were there alternative options?
Lord Sugar should put his £250k into The Bridge cafe, decent brand, 12 weeks exposure on national TV each year, plenty of losing candidate footfall .... #TheApprentice
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
Close
4 Comments
This is YOUR comments community. Stay civil, stay constructive, stay on topic.
Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy
here
before taking part.
Monday 23 December, 2024
Monday 23 December, 2024
Download our app
People really weren't happy with the massive, dramatic twist in the final of The Apprentice last night
IF YOU’VE BEEN following along with The Apprentice for the whole series, you’ll be aware that 2017′s selection of candidates hasn’t exactly been the strongest in the show’s history.
James and Sarah were the last two standing going into last night’s final – and if you didn’t watch it and care about who won, now’s the time to look away:
Instead of a tense, climactic moment where Sugar picked a winner in the boardroom… he hired both candidates
OK.
There was mutiny among Apprentice viewers
This is not how it’s supposed to work
They wanted BLOOD
Alan Sugar? More like Oprah
Whoops!
We couldn't find this Tweet
Ridiculous scenes
Whoops!
We couldn't find this Tweet
Never before in the history of the show has a double hiring took place – with Sugar making investments in James’s recruitment business and Sarah’s sweet company.
People were quick to point out that Michaela had been fired for not focussing her efforts on one business
#JusticeForMichaela
With people commenting throughout the season that it wasn’t exactly a stellar lineup, you had to feel for the people who came second in other years
Sugar’s just, like, so quirky
Whoops!
We couldn't find this Tweet
Were there alternative options?
They could immediately pump that money into the decor.
It’s hard to find a single person on social media who thinks that last night’s ending was a satisfying conclusion to the show
Whoops!
We couldn't find this Tweet
Next year’s Apprentice is going to be good though
Whoops!
We couldn't find this Tweet
You get a business! You get a business! We all get businesses!
DailyEdge is on Instagram!
To embed this post, copy the code below on your site
alan sugar Oh Sugar Unprecedented What is happening?